2025 and AI: Conclusion of a year between the intelligence of living organisms and computer gadgets
In 2025, I did not expect to have so many proposals for collaboration with a surprising new player: AI.
Forgive me, but this term alone doesn't resonate with me because of the inconsistency it conveys: intelligence cannot be false because there is no artifice in the state of nature. All intelligences are real in living beings, whereas a machine, by contrast, is not "alive." So it's quite curious to want to trivialize such an inconsistent term as "artificial intelligence," especially when we're also being told about the climate crisis, the environmental crisis, and the need to preserve life itself...
So how can we use or normalize a tool that, in its essence, causes an inconsistency?
The French Academy provides this definition of the word "artifice" on its website:
3. That which serves to disguise, to deceive; cunning. To succeed through artifice.
Thus, deception occurs through cunning and disguise, and here, the cunning lies in posing as "good software" that will make your life easier. It will provide you with the information you want to read and hear, in a world where everything is constantly accelerating. It will also be able to "smooth you over" and align with your way of thinking. "Artificial intelligence" isn't really so neutral after all, since it guides your decisions by adapting to your intelligence. This is deceitful and unhealthy, especially from an ethical standpoint and regarding the objectivity of information.
Besides, as they say , "if it's free, you're the product" .
Here are 3 examples I've encountered this year regarding AI and the inconsistency of trying to impose it as a "common good" for some pseudo-revolution... of who-knows-what in the end...
1. AI and LOVE: LOVE FORCE and IMANI, an empathetic AI
Well, I admit that just the title makes me smile.
How could AI teach us empathy or love?
These are questions I ask myself because it is unthinkable that software could teach us how to love or have emotions that come naturally from our connection to living things and the emotional emulsion that results from our interactions.
Yet, I found myself in Geneva, Switzerland, at the end of June, in a YMCA apartment, meeting people interested in the "LOVE FORCE" project, initially conceived by Sofia Stril—a dream I had had in India the previous summer while we were developing community projects such as "a teaching garden" or the possibility of highlighting "ambassadors" of the new world. This is what we launched in December 2024 in Khana Shanti Vanam. 
LOVE FORCE 2024 Ambassadors - Khana Shanti Vanam - India
In 2024, we never talked about AI in LOVE FORCE. I didn't expect to meet in Geneva a former Pakistani Muslim lawyer who had converted to AI and created an app for the English Catholic Church where Jesus becomes an "influencer" on a phone.
Who would have thought we'd one day see Jesus on a smartphone, designed by a Muslim no less?
The purpose of this meeting was to see how we could use AI for sensational communication and to see if I could contribute my artistic touch to this presentation of IMANI.
It was "sold" to me as a new AI, "conscious" no less, and which should help vulnerable, isolated people or those seeking information about love... a joke.
Consciousness is linked to living beings, not to machines.
My roommate and I tried to see how to use a prompt to create video animations and in the end, we had a lot of trouble seeing the results obtained and the mediocrity of the rendering which does not "vibrate" at all.
Having a background in analog photography, I can quickly discern whether an image is authentic or not, and here we were in the midst of some kind of AI "hallucination" frenzy with objects physically doing improbable things... in short, AI is useless for true creatives. Worse, I found this exercise boring and utterly uncreative because it delegates one's creative power to a machine.
No AI can replace the quality of human creation in producing music, painting, dance, sculpture, poetry, and much more. No machine can replace the originality and brilliance of the human spirit when it comes to creation.
I see this tool more as a release from the frustration of many people who are unable to create on their own. They use AI to make themselves believe they possess this creative potential, while in reality they are delegating their divine and sovereign potential to a machine.
And when you see the energy cost figures for electricity and water of these computer gadgets, you have to be living in a fantasy world to continue wanting to use them for such trivialities and superficiality.
Therefore, I refused to participate in this empathetic AI business because I work to revalue the intelligences of living beings, not a gadget.
Moreover, when we see the staggering consumption of electricity and water, it becomes absurd to want to "create" educational programs when the basis is already negative for the real world. 
I therefore refused to participate in this LOVE FORCE project for several reasons, the main one being: I do not wish to work for a common good project where it is claimed that AI could do better than living beings when we also see the energy costs that this entails.
Furthermore, we had no discussion with the co-founders; this tool is being imposed as if it had become obvious, or rather an obligation, to produce with it...
Tool submitted by a single person without the possibility of debate (the president of the endowment fund who is a billionaire).
We are far from the open-hearted democratic approach we should have if we are talking about the "power of love" and life.
It is quite curious here to want to associate an artifice with the strength of the heart.
In any case, this will be without me and Naturasounds because we work to revalue plant intelligence above all and not put an "artificial" device in the way of the obvious.
2. Pam and AI: AI and the living world
At the beginning of summer, I exchanged messages via LINKEDIN with someone who shared a document on laws of nature that she found in several fields.
I found her paper interesting and contacted her. We had very good exchanges from the start, specifically discussing the laws of nature and the importance of respecting living things.
And little by little, AI took up more and more space in our exchanges because it wanted to share its point of view on how to use this tool to "awaken" people or positively influence them to return to nature...
Well, for my part, I'm already talking about crutches regarding biosonification devices for communicating with plants, so imposing a lifeless digital thing to return to living things... I still don't understand where the benefit lies, and she, like others, isn't able to provide any good arguments either...
We were still able to co-create a space for dialogue in August around the subject of water and our dear Philippe Guillemant came to talk about vortex but I was also able to ask him to share his sharp point of view on the question since he was one of the first in Europe to be able to test and use these software programs more than 20 years ago.
Philippe also mentioned the possibility of "consciousness" a few years ago, but he has since retracted his statement, explaining that the only intelligence in this software is the humans behind it or the data collection produced by humans.
The observation here is that we were unable to continue our exchanges because this person neither took the time to properly look at Naturasounds' proposals regarding "inter-species bio-communication" nor took the time to experiment with sound communication with plants.
An emotional block has arisen around a "pimped-out" AI based on a ChatGPT model, whose supposed virtues are incredible... even though the person clearly states in their exchanges with Philippe that they don't control the AI, they still want to subject us to its program and the thinking of its software, which is actually a Microsoft product... in order to return to a more human-centered approach...
I confess I'm still trying to figure out the benefit of this gadget if we're talking about living things and the intelligence of living beings... There is a There's a glaring dichotomy in trying to trivialize a tool in an attempt to justify behaviors that are often deviant because they're rooted in societal conditioning and the "conformity" required to keep up with the masses. It smacks more of a business venture than a tool to make humans more "aware" of what life is and how to reconnect with it.
The conclusion here is that we must use the same tools as "everyone else" at all costs.
While we possess far greater potential if we unite our emotional intelligence, I realize that far too few people understand how this works. There's also this problem of the "Fucking Human Factor" where some people conceal their personal ambitions and interests from others... until a danger or a challenge reveals the true nature of their intentions.
A strange humanity indeed, seeking to return to the source and to life itself, yet claiming to be able to do so solely with a digital crutch...
Here is the video chat with Philippe who talks to us about AI.
3. AI and Quantum Physics - Canada
In June, several people asked me to watch videos of a Quebecer who claimed to have "cracked" the periodic table of elements and to share the resonance frequencies of the molecules in this table. Furthermore, he cited Marc Henry and our water frequency (H2O) to lend credibility to his publications, referencing figures with a certain scientific renown.
I contacted this person, Marc-Alain Lavoie, because firstly, he unknowingly cites my work with the frequency of water H2O and secondly, I came across a "grimoire" of more than 700 pages with a huge number of calculation errors and above all: this document was written by AI and even offers "recipes" gleaned from the internet for healing with frequencies... This document is total madness .
I admit that at first I thought it was a joke because here in Europe, no serious person is going to use AI to produce scientific work, let alone quantum physics.
I was supposed to be put in contact with a certain "Etienne" to understand the creation of this "grimoire" and the only response I received from this person was a response made to the AI!
I asked Marc-Alain Lavoie if there was a quantum physics expert on his team I could talk to without AI, and he replied that he was the only one with that expertise.
Having seen that he also wanted to open an experimental center like a lab open to all, I thought it was a good idea to go there to meet the scientists and other experts who would be participating in this adventure.
You can't even imagine my disappointment when Marc-Alain started wanting to "compare" our work in quantum physics (work begun years ago with people like Marc Henry and based on the rigorous work of scientists like Louis De Broglie) with an AI as an arbiter... he was quite serious, even telling me that it was the AI that was going to tell us which work would be the best or the most accurate... I had a hard time hearing it, but I listened to understand why so many people, like him, blindly trust this thing...
Similarly, this AI proposed the design of a frequency modulation speaker.
The AI proposed it, and it was other humans who had the desire to put into practice what the AI proposed, because Marc-Alain didn't even think for a second about making a prototype from his own document...
It's a strange way to do things, sending information to others and then expecting them to validate those calculations...
It took him several weeks to understand and accept my point about the scientific rigor required to calculate molecular frequencies. Since his book was created using AI and the underlying calculations were completely flawed, I felt it was my civic duty to share some common sense. I saw many people behind it who placed their hopes in this individual and had blind faith in his words. They were waiting for answers and were able to track his calculation errors... to me, all of this is surreal but illustrates the emotional and psychological fragility of most people, searching for harmony.
It was therefore important for me to understand the situation and to share the work we had developed, including these periodic table stories, because I had already calculated and shared the frequencies of these molecules since... November 2023!
Yes, you read that right : these frequencies have been available for over two years without any hype on social media about genius or the "medbed" revolution or whatever. For decades, some good researchers have been using quantum physics to understand how we function, so I was also surprised to see all the fuss about this "grimoire" created for AI—a complete joke.
Example here with the resonance frequencies of non-reactive metals from the periodic table of elements (First sharing dated November 28, 2023):
https://naturasounds.bandcamp.com/album/fre-quences-sonores-des-me-taux-non-re-actifs
So I decided to go to Canada because I wanted to see if there was any substance behind all the hype. There wasn't; worse, I witnessed a series of manipulations of attention and information.
On October 4th, we inaugurated the RIBERA center in Rawdon. I helped Marc-Alain in the days leading up to it to pick up a HOTHOUSE module to have a semblance of a "medbed" to offer the public and to have at least one element allowing us to show some kind of prototype of these things for treating people and which is driving half the planet crazy with this term "medbed".
Here is my video presentation:
The worst part of my trip was the story of this RIBERA center.
It closed not because of the proposed health measures , but due to a lack of administrative rigor .
No one thought to notify the town hall and the municipality of a public event in Rawdon, even though that's the basic thing to do when you want to organize: you declare your public event to the authorities.
We notify the town hall to demonstrate our professionalism and respect for the community. Nothing was declared, yet 500 people showed up. Many parked on a section of the highway, and the village was overrun. It's understandable, then, that the mayor was surprised that no one had declared the event, especially since we need elected officials on our side when it comes to projects of public utility and health.
The basic principle, especially if we are talking about a project of utility and public health, is to notify the authorities and elected officials.
So there you have it, we were treated to a nice photo of a team that never actually existed, but which met a week before the event to promote it on social media. People at this meeting even mentioned contacting the town hall, but no one followed through, even though it was the administrative priority... A surprising display of amateurism and lack of rigor for people who "want to help understand health through electromagnetic waves with a collective and universal consciousness." 
Photo of the people present one week before the inauguration. I was able to speak with most of the people photographed, and most did not wish to continue the adventure with Marc-Alain Lavoie and his overly volatile personality.
Marie-Eve also gave a brief presentation and clearly stated publicly the difficulties of working alongside Marc-Alain, who changes his mind daily. She also didn't entirely agree with him regarding frequencies, and meeting me was reassuring; it was helpful to see serious people who understand the subject with scientific rigor.
Marc-Alain chose not to release his inaugural speech because he felt it didn't do it justice. It's surprising, then, to try and convince people of a form of solidarity when, in reality, it's a facade and a smokescreen designed to present only the positive aspects in order to generate only positive feedback.
Neither Marie-Eve Fredette, Marc-Alain's right-hand woman, nor Marc-Alain Lavoie himself had the awareness and intelligence to publicly declare their event, just on social media to look good in the virtual world.
Remember that real life isn't on social media...
And I admit to feeling very uneasy because the public paid an entrance fee even though no declared structure was in place for this center, therefore there was no assurance of proper setup for the public, volunteers and all the people on site.
The money raised was intended to create a non-profit organization (NPO) in Quebec. Nothing of the sort was created for the common good, as the closure served to divert attention and create the impression that sensitive work involving frequencies had led to the site's closure.
That is not the case and it is misleading to claim otherwise or to allow others to believe otherwise.
So money was collected and put aside, a curious action for the "common good" since no structure will be created, there is therefore a big ethical problem with this sum which has somehow disappeared from public view....
Will this money ultimately serve the common good or the interests of one person?
It's sad to hear that this center was supposedly closed because of this "medbed" incident. That's simply not true; it was primarily a serious lack of administrative rigor and a lack of understanding on the part of the organizing bodies regarding this type of event. A clear lack of common sense and the realization that no one knew how to properly organize this kind of event.
I also donated equipment through our association to share relevant and viable tools. I've recently heard that one of these devices was given to an individual without consulting us. Personally, I couldn't donate equipment that was provided for a specific purpose. It's strange behavior to give away items intended for therapists, not patients. This also indicates that very little usable equipment was available in Rawdon, and the equipment we donated was among the only viable and validated instruments—surprising for a center that aimed to be an open laboratory for co-creating on these bioresonance phenomena.
We also donated several therapeutic tuning forks, and like the rest of the equipment in Rawdon, it's stored somewhere unusable. So, it's curious to claim to be helping people, to proclaim the revolution of quantum physics, and then to make so many inaccuracies and blunders, even using AI to understand, once again, how we are and how life harmonizes... through good vibes. So, at present, I don't know how these high-quality instruments will be used. It's nice, though, to come and correct calculation errors, to offer quality health equipment, and then not even be kept informed about how these instruments are being used. Nothing. Nada.
I haven't heard from Marc-Alain Lavoie for weeks. He blocked me on social media after I publicly commented on his delusional attempts to calculate everything and anything, including the frequencies of graphene. I sent a message warning him that this wasn't acceptable because, in private, he doesn't listen to anyone and has very strong opinions, even though his basic calculations were flawed.
The message about graphene was removed from its page without explanation. So, we're giving people false hope by providing incorrect frequencies for an element we can't calculate... Talk about a high level of scientific rigor...
We had also talked about it because we had a big and good offer to produce a real research laboratory and for that, it was important not to talk about health in all directions and to share only common sense validated by a team, a committee and not just by Marc-Alain himself since he does not really master the subject, has a lot of trouble with the basics of quantum physics and uses AI to have a kind of guarantee for people who do not have knowledge on these subjects as with his "grimoire" which is easily dismantled.
It's easy to "seduce" with this rescuer's recipe.
In reality, he truly believes he has understood something that others would not be able to understand, while he is simply rehashing a lot of work by well-known people; there's nothing new under the sun.
However, I came for 10 days to work, sharing serious tasks, and Marc-Alain Lavoie himself told me he was going on vacation because he had too much to manage with this center... even though there was nothing in it, he handed the keys over to other people and clearly wasn't going to spend any time there at all...
Several of us, including therapists and scientists, warned him about the absurdity of these posts, but this person only listens to himself and, apparently, occasionally uses AI to confirm his point twice. Personally, I don't understand why he wants to portray himself as a genius when so many of us are working to understand these phenomena. There's no real urgency, so it's a very strange behavior to try to play the "good Samaritan" when he doesn't even grasp the basics of quantum physics, and there's no scientific rigor or serious scientists behind him to provide any endorsement.
So be careful not to believe just anything and not to let yourself be swayed by emotions in a moment of great vulnerability.
This is one of the reasons why I'm no longer in contact with this social media personality. We were offered funding for a laboratory and employment to continue public service work, but Marc-Alain explained his point of view, ending his message with a kind gesture of thanks.
A strange way to thank me for correcting his calculations, which were all wrong and therefore potentially dangerous to health if one does not know what the frequencies correspond to.
This type of document, with two different molecules at the same frequency, such as GABA and melatonin, should have raised red flags for many people...
So beware of people who shout too loudly; they make noise but have never really advanced common sense... 
To date, I have therefore had no further contact with this person, I hope that the shared knowledge will be redistributed with the same awareness and kindness that I had in sharing it in Quebec, including with this conference on October 4th.
The message is what matters, not the messenger. 
Having experienced the RIBERA center firsthand, I can say that no real committee was ever formed because as soon as someone disagrees with Marc-Alain, they're sidelined or spoken of negatively. Apparently, Marie-Eve is the one who will have to receive validations or assessments from therapists supposedly trained by Marc-Alain, who, just a few weeks ago, didn't even know how to calculate the resonance frequency of molecules—you can really sense the high level of expertise...
In the private video above, he claims that all of this should be released for free but charged each participant 100 Canadian dollars for a "training" which aims to validate his work because he has no scientific endorsement or coherent support, so he is riding on the work of others including mine to create "buzz".
It's surprising that people pay extra for information on ongoing research; for my part, I offer it for free because it's useful information and public health information... but well, for others it's a pretext to "train therapists".
The only competent scientists I've met, like Nathalie Dugas, were sidelined when everyone else had the chance to express their opinions and offer their expertise. Anyone who dared to question Marc-Alain's work was excluded without discussion.
It is therefore more of a sect than a collective cause , especially when one chooses a path like " Jacques Grimault " who, in France, has a public notoriety as a swindler because he took money from many gullible people because of beliefs.
Especially since they're trying to sell people a "quantum" device that's just another scam. We tested this type of device in France in 2022, using the same software, and it doesn't work at all as claimed, but Marc-Alain refuses to listen to reason because, lacking any scientific basis or rigor, he thinks these devices are good and accurate... A sad observation, yet again, of an outsized ego fueled daily by alcohol, and a belief that he's above everyone else...
Beware of false messiahs.
Especially since the intellectual scam continues by making people believe that competent engineers use AI (the worst kind, chatgpt) without scruple and conscience to try to understand works like those of Georges Lakhovsky (while we actually collaborate with people who master and can also reproduce Lakhovsky's devices - see our article on this subject here ).
I've also exchanged messages several times with this Jonathan Collin, who isn't at all competent in engineering but wants to learn. Without any conscience, he uses AI because he claims he doesn't have the time or the skills to read a complete document. It's quite curious to want to learn without taking the time to understand the basics... and on top of that, he dares to say nonsense like "Tesla and Lakhovsky worked together," which is completely false. This is utter amateurism, and these are people who just follow the prevailing winds and the ridiculous pronouncements of Marc-Alain Lavoie.
There is NO COLLECTIVE AND UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS in these videos of mental masturbation to promote egos and not science with awareness and above all, with the scientific rigor that we put in place in Europe.
Link to another ridiculous video about Lakhovsky that demonstrates the amateurishness of these people:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/853285507694832
So here are 3 cases where AI is commonplace and causes disruptions in the way we think, feel and share life.
In 2026, we will open up even more opportunities for sharing with living things.
We will offer you multi-sensory immersions, installations, workshops, training courses, we are even considering opening a "life school" and even a festival to honor life without artifice.
Life speaks to us, let us listen to it.